
No brackets or seeding today boys and girls. Instead, some good old-fashioned bubble breakdown. One day during Championship Week, I like to just post the credentials/resume of the teams that are on my bubble. This way, it gives you a chance to deicde for yourself who you think deserves those final few spots in the field.
As of the morning of Thursday, March 8th, I think there are 10 spots still in play and 19 teams fighting for those spots. Of course, as I write this, UConn is leading Syracuse and regardless of winning or losing this game, is likely in just because of the performance against one of the top 2 teams in the country and on a neutral court AND on their third day of playing basketball in a row.
So with that said, here they are: your candidates for the final at-large spots in the Barnes Bracketology field of 68.
Listed in alphabetical order (RPI rankings from ESPN.com)SOS = strength of schedule
Arizona (21-10)RPI: 79
SOS: 87
Non-Conf SOS: 131
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 1-4
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 5-8
Road W-L: 7-5
Quality Wins: @ California
Bad Losses: UCLA, Arizona State
Case FOR: Good road record, good overall record
Case AGAINST: Lot of bad RPI and SOS numbers, only one top-50 RPI win
California (23-8)RPI: 37
SOS: 100
Non-Conf SOS: 80
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 2-3
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 7-6
Road W-L: 5-6
Quality Wins: Oregon (x 2), @ Washington
Bad Losses: Oregon State, Washington State
Case FOR: Best RPI number of all Pac-12 teams, good overall record, RPI Top-100 wins solid
Case AGAINST: SOS is not good, quality wins are only in conference, and conference was weak.
Colorado State (18-10)RPI: 20
SOS: 4
Non-Conf SOS: 26
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 3-5
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 7-8
Road W-L: 3-9
Quality Wins: San Diego State, New Mexico, UNLV
Bad Losses: TCU, Boise State
Case FOR: Great RPI and SOS numbers though they are misleading, good quality wins, not bad against RPI Top-100
Case AGAINST: Not a good road record, lots of losses, would be 4th team in Mountain West
Drexel (27-6)RPI: 65
SOS: 249
Non-Conf SOS: 226
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50:1-2
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 4-3
Road W-L: 11-3
Quality Wins: VCU
Bad Losses: Norfolk State, Georgia State, Delaware
Case FOR: Great overall record, won 25 of last 27 games, fantastic road record, not bad against top-100 in small sample
Case AGAINST: SOS is terrible, only one top-50 RPI win, bad losses are real black eyes
Iona (25-7)RPI: 45
SOS: 156
Non-Conf SOS: 44
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 1-1
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 5-3
Road W-L: 11-4
Quality Wins: Nevada
Bad Losses: Fairfield, Manhattan (at home), Hofstra, Siena
Case FOR: Good RPI number, Played tough non-conference schedule, good road record, good vs. RPI top-100 when given chance
Case AGAINST: SOS is not good, not a real quality win, lots of bad losses
Long Beach State (20-8)RPI: 35
SOS: 89
Non-Conf SOS: 1
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 0-6
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 2-7
Road W-L: 8-7
Quality Wins: Xavier
Bad Losses: Cal-State Fullerton
Case FOR: Solid RPI number, only one loss in conference play, played toughest non-conference schedule in the country
Case AGAINST: Didn't beat any of the top-50 RPI teams they played, bad loss to end conference play
Miami (FL) (18-11)RPI: 51
SOS: 50
Non-Conf SOS: 129
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 2-7
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 3-10
Road W-L: 4-8
Quality Wins: @ Duke, Florida State
Bad Losses: Maryland, NC State (x 2)
Case FOR: Great win at Duke, Decent and SOS number
Case AGAINST: Lots of chances but not many wins against top competition, 2 losses to fellow bubble team NC State, non-conference schedule weak
Mississippi State (21-10)RPI: 62
SOS: 76
Non-Conf SOS: 197
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 3-4
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 8-8
Road W-L: 3-6
Quality Wins: West Virginia, Alabama, @ Vanderbilt
Bad Losses: Georgia (at home), Auburn
Case FOR: Good quality wins, good record vs. RPI Top 100
Case AGAINST: Awful non-conference schedule, RPI and SOS numbers not strong
NC State (20-11)RPI: 52
SOS: 19
Non-Conf SOS: 16
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 1-8
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 5-9
Road W-L: 5-4
Quality Wins: Texas, Miami (FL) (x 2)
Bad Losses: Clemson, Georgia Tech (at home)
Case FOR: Great SOS and non-conference SOS numbers, decent RPI number, good road record, wins against fellow bubble teams
Case AGAINST: Only one top-50 RPI win despite numerous chances
Northwestern (18-12)RPI: 44
SOS: 8
Non-Conf SOS: 51
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 1-10
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 5-12
Road W-L: 4-7
Quality Wins: Michigan State, Seton Hall
Bad Losses: None
Case FOR: Good RPI number, strong SOS number, 5 top-100 RPI wins, not one really bad loss
Case AGAINST: 11 chances against top-50 RPI teams and just one win
Oregon (22-8)RPI: 49
SOS: 87
Non-Conf SOS: 116
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 0-5
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 5-7
Road W-L: 7-4
Quality Wins: @ Arizona, Washington
Bad Losses: Oregon State (at home)
Case FOR: Decent RPI number, not bad against top-100 RPI
Case AGAINST: No real quality wins, did nothing in non-conference, overall SOS isn't great
Seton Hall (20-12)RPI: 59
SOS: 49
Non-Conf SOS: 119
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 4-8
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 7-9
Road W-L: 4-7
Quality Wins: VCU, West Virginia, UConn, Georgetown
Bad Losses: Villanova, DePaul, Rutgers (at home)
Case FOR: 4 quality wins, SOS is good, not a bad record vs. RPI top-100
Case AGAINST: Did nothing really in non-conference, DePaul loss is a black eye, had a rough February and March
South Florida (20-12)RPI: 43
SOS: 32
Non-Conf SOS: 33
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 1-9
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 6-9
Road W-L: 5-8
Quality Wins: @ Louisville, Seton Hall, Cincinnati
Bad Losses: Old Dominion, Auburn, Penn State
Case FOR: Good RPI and SOS numbers, decent against RPI top-100, good Big East record (12-6)
Case AGAINST: 1 win in 10 chances against RPI top-50, 3 awful losses early in the season
Tennessee (18-13)RPI: 75
SOS: 40
Non-Conf SOS: 165
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 4-7
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 7-9
Road W-L: 3-8
Quality Wins: Florida (x 2), UConn, Vanderbilt
Bad Losses: Oakland, Charleston, Georgia, Austin Peay (at home)
Case FOR: SOS is pretty good, great quality wins including sweep of Florida
Case AGAINST: RPI number not good, played weak non-conference schedule, a lot of bad losses
Texas (19-12)RPI: 50
SOS: 20
Non-Conf SOS: 93
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 3-9
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 4-10
Road W-L: 4-7
Quality Wins: Temple, Iowa State, Kansas State
Bad Losses: Oregon State, Oklahoma State
Case FOR: Decent RPI, good SOS, 3 very good quality wins
Case AGAINST: Non-conference SOS not amazing, lots of chances for big wins and not a lot of wins
UConn (20-12)RPI: 33
SOS: 3
Non-Conf SOS: 11
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 6-6
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 10-10
Road W-L: 3-7
Quality Wins: Florida State, Harvard, @ South Florida, West Virginia, Notre Dame, @ West Virginia
Bad Losses: Rutgers, Providence
Case FOR: Good RPI and SOS numbers, 6 top-50 RPI wins
Case AGAINST: Did not have a good February with Jim Calhoun not on sidelines
Xavier (19-11)RPI: 55
SOS: 52
Non-Conf SOS: 60
Wins. vs. RPI Top 50: 2-6
Wins vs. RPI Top 100: 6-10
Road W-L: 5-7
Quality Wins: @ Vanderbilt, Purdue, Cincinnati
Bad Losses: Hawaii
Case FOR: 3 good quality wins, decent RPI and SOS numbers, not bad on the road
Case AGAINST: 6-10 against the top-100 isn't amazing, didn't beat the best teams in their own conference
So now you see what I see. Who should be in and who should be out? I'll have my latest thoughts tomorrow complete with a new bracket. Until then, GO BOBCATS!
MB